Doctor in the House – Levaquin: One MD’s Opinion
2 Feb
Here’s a nice summary of the risks of Levaquin and why it is still on the market;
Dear Dr. Donohue: Just how dangerous is the drug Levaquin? I read that it should not be given to a person over 60…
- A.S.
Dr. Dohohue: Levaquin (levofloxacin) is a newer antibiotic that has rescued many from dangerous infections and has been lifesaving for quite a few. Common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, insomnia, headache and constipation. Those are potential side effects of almost all drugs.
More-serious side effects are tendon inflammation and even tendon rupture. The Achilles tendon, the heel cord, is the one most often affected. The medicine makes some people quite sensitive to sunlight and sunburn. It has caused liver and kidney damage. It might affect the way the heart beats and could cause dangerous heart rhythms. These things are more likely to happen to people over 60. With all this, how could such a medicine be allowed on the market? These outcomes are exceedingly rare, and the drug’s benefits greatly tip the scales in its favor.
Source: http://www.herald-review.com/lifestyles/health-med-fit/article_2906a269-7b4b-543d-ace6-7ab9abc4909b.html
As Dr. Paul Donohoe, a nationally-syndicated columnist whose health article is carried in over 175 newspapers, states (although if you’re reading this you’ll know we strongly believe that these results are anything but “exceedingly rare”, as most people would not have even thought, let alone reported, that a tendon injury could possibly be caused by a pill that they’ve only taken a few times days, weeks or months earlier), there are significant benefits unique to Levaquin. This doesn’t change the fact that there are dangerous risks associated with the drug, and the “unique benefits” in many cases do not benefit the consumer, whose ailments oftentimes may be fixed with a less drastic measure.
As for the complaints consumers (and we at LevaquinBlog) have, it is not enough that the “benefits outweigh the risks” for the drug to be on the market. What is necessary, both morally as well as legally, is that these risks are known by the same people who learn about their benefits. That is, if we are going to hear how great it is (Levaquin is so wonderful! You only need to take 5 pills instead of 21!), then the risks should be equally available and accessible. And this didn’t happen. While the studies were available to Orth-McNeil, they did not properly warn the public (including consumers and doctors) until the FDA forced its hand.
That is the cause of all the lawsuits out there – not that Levaquin causes these terrible symptoms, but that Orth0-McNeil knew about these risks and didn’t warn us until it was too late.















Recent Comments